Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Horror List Book Review: Swan Song

I'm reading through three lists of best horror with two friends (DeAnna Knippling and M.B. Partlow), posting reviews as we go. (For more information, including a list of the books, see this post.) To see the books I've reviewed so far, you can view the list at the end of this post where I rank them.

This week I'm reviewing Swan Song, by Robert McCammon.


Unless I missed it while scanning back, it's been since June that I reviewed one of the books from the horror list. Yikes! But I've read other books in the meantime.

First, I need to say this was another loooong one. Nearly 919 pages. It took me awhile to get into it (about 240 pages, if I'm remembering correctly, which is about the time I went, "Oh, now it's getting interesting.") I didn't care for all the setup, and it at first seemed like it was going to be too regimented and militaristic due to the focus of the story at that time. It did get more interesting, however, and the momentum built continuously from there.

Interesting side note: I was reading this when the North Korea tweet occurred, and people were talking about nuclear attack. Why is this interesting? Because the story is about Russia (it was written in the 80s) nuking the entirety of the U.S. from ships. They hit all the big cities. All infrastructure is wiped out, and the survivors (barely) are forced to help themselves, rescue themselves, deal with the effects of the blasts, find food, find water that isn't tainted, etc. It was a timely reading.

While it's a good book, McCammon does a lot of head hopping, even within paragraphs, and I found this wearing. For the most part, it was easy to follow who the new POV character was, but there were many times I had to go back and re-read to figure out why an action had come from someone I didn't expect it to. So how many head hops did I miss because nothing triggered me to think something was wrong? There were A LOT of POV characters. We saw into the heads of both villains and hapless heroes. 

The characters were interesting, though the bad guys were edging toward caricature. The good guys were mostly highly likable, though, and it was those people who kept me reading, because I needed to finish out their stories.

If you like post-apocalyptic, this is one hell of an apocalypse. We meet the characters just before everything goes down, ride through the nuclear attack with them, and then see their progress for, I think, seven years. It's quite similar to "The Stand" in that it's an examination of good vs. evil in dire circumstances, with characters journeying across the U.S. to the place of their final countdown. There is also an element of magic woven throughout, with several of the characters having the ability to see each other and even a bit of the future using magical items. Plus, the big bad guy is somewhat magical, as is the major good guy (Swan). 

If you can muck your way through the beginning, the rest of the book is worth the read. I happened across an online discussion about the book while I was struggling to move forward, and this was repeated over and over. It gets better.

My new rankings:

1. The Handmaid's Tale (Margaret Atwood)
2. The Bottoms (Joe R. Lansdale)
3. Coraline (Neil Gaiman)
4. A Choir of Ill Children (Tom Piccirilli)
6. The Year’s Best Fantasy: First Annual Collection (Ellen Datlow and Terri Windling)
7. Needful Things (Stephen King)
8. 1Q84 (Haruki Murakami)
9. Those Who Hunt the Night (Barbara Hambly)
11. 20th Century Ghosts (Joe Hill)
12. Rebecca (Daphne DuMaurier)
13. Dark Forces (Kirby McCauly)
14. Swan Song (Robert McCammon)
15. Dawn (Xenogenesis, Book 1) (Octavia E. Butler)
16. Wet Work (Philip Nutman)
17. The Stranger (Albert Camus)
18. Dead in the Water (Nancy Holder)
19. The Witches (Roald Dahl)
20. Psycho (Robert Bloch)
21. The Damnation Game (Clive Barker)
22. The Wolf's Hour (Robert McCammon)
23. Berserk (Tim Lebbon)
24. Prime Evil (Douglas E. Winter)
25. Best New Horror, Volume 1 (edited by Stephen Jones and Ramsey Campbell)
26. Flowers in the Attic (V.C. Andrews)
27. The Tomb (F. Paul Wilson)
28. Shadowland (Peter Straub)
29. Blood Meridian (Cormac McCarthy)
30. The Imago Sequence (Laird Barron)
31. My Soul to Keep (Tananarive Due)
32. Penpal (Dathan Auerbach)
33. World War Z (Max Brooks)
34. From the Dust Returned (Ray Bradbury) 
35. The Red Tree (Caitlin R. Kiernan)
36. In Silent Graves (Gary A. Braunbeck)
37. The Cipher (Kathe Koja)
38. Drawing Blood (Poppy Z. Brite)
39. The Doll Who Ate His Mother (Ramsey Campbell) 
40. Hotel Transylvania (Chelsea Quinn Yarbro)
41. Naked Lunch (William S. Burroughs)

I'm not sure which book I'm reading next, but it may be by Robin Cook.

Have you read Swan Song? Did you like it? Was the beginning hard to get through, or did you not have the same problem?

May you find your Muse.

6 comments:

  1. Hi Shannon - I admire you persevering ... 240 pages before you got into the book ...I'd have given up long ago ... but good luck with your reading reviews. Cheers Hilary

    ReplyDelete
  2. I can't imagine slugging through 240 pages to get to the good part. You are a very patient person. I recognize several of my favorites on your list including my number one: Shadowland. World War Z and Flowers in the Attic are also tops with me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not much of a horror reader, although the concept to this story sounds interesting.

    However, it seems to have the kind of issues that make me stop reading.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I might give this a try. I sure loved The Stand and I do like Post-apocalyptic :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I read this book many years ago, and I don't remember a thing! =P Yet I read The Stand long ago, too, and I recall a lot more about that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. At least their story is unrealistically pessimistic about our enemy's capacity for hitting all our cities...? No, everything still feels dire. Yurgh!

    ReplyDelete