Friday, August 7, 2015

Horror List Book Review: The Damnation Game

I'm reading through three lists of best horror with two friends (DeAnna Knippling and M.B. Partlow), posting reviews as we go. (For more information, including a list of the books, see this post.) To see the books I've reviewed so far, you can view the list at the end of this post where I rank them. 

This week I'm reviewing The Damnation Game, by Clive Barker.



So, hey, first things first: this one was actually horror, which was a refreshing change from some of the books on the list. 

I was wary, at first. I've had two experiences with Clive Barker: Hellraiser and a novella I read. He's a little gross for me, focused more on physical torture than scares, and I don't enjoy torture porn. However, I enjoyed this one, for the most part. It was long and took me awhile to get through, but my reading time is limited.

To give you a short summary, Martin Strauss is a convict. He gets early parole for becoming the live-in bodyguard of a man named Whitehead. He isn't told what he needs to protect him from, ultimately discovering that the threat isn't wholly mortal. Mamoulian is weak and desperate, but he holds great power, including the ability to raise the dead, and Whitehead owes him a debt.  

The characters weren't especially likable, except for the main character, Marty. He wasn't a good guy, but he wasn't a bad guy. He was solid and human, normal. I really only liked one other character, and he made it maybe halfway through. I can't say the other characters were horrible, but they were deeply flawed and selfish. Marty starts out as selfish as the others, but his character grows through the book, which is exactly what they're supposed to do. 

Barker gets the reader involved, at first through the mystery of what's going on, and then because you care about certain characters surviving what's coming. I felt like I could tell some things Barker didn't like. Dogs, for instance. I'm pretty sure he doesn't like dogs. All the characters hate dogs (except one), and awful things happen to dogs in the story. Judging by his treatment of religion, I'd say he doesn't think much of that either. And I'm pretty sure he doesn't think much of women, at least not sexually. There was something in the one sex scene in the story that squicked me out; it's still squicking me out. Ew. 

One thing I've noticed about Barker is his interest in flesh. Torturing flesh, cutting flesh, rotting flesh, missing flesh. There was plenty of that in this story, but much of the horror was actually supernatural. In fact, there were many elements to the horror in this story, as I sit here thinking about it. Some of them were gross, but some were more mental or emotional in nature. 

I mentioned flesh above. When I discussed this with DeAnna, she pointed out to me that she thought it wasn't just flesh, but connections. I continued reading with that in mind, and she was right. Overlooking the physical, connections came up in a lot of ways, with multiple kinds of connections between different characters, for instance, and even the direct act of connecting to each other's minds. Some of the supernatural connections grew with emotional connections. There are historical connections and modern connections. So on and so forth. He interlinks many elements.

As far as his writing, it was more lyrical than I expected. It flowed nicely, and there were many sections I considered writing down. It took awhile for the story to get into the scary stuff, and I wouldn't have minded some of the beginning having been cut out, but I enjoyed it once the pace and tension picked up.

It wasn't my favorite of the books on the list, but it was a good book, with solid horror elements and strong characterizations. There were several truly cringe-worthy scenes, and I was vested in the main character. Not only that, but there were spots where what appeared to be coming made me hesitant to read it while staying at the cabin in Estes Park. I still read it, but I thought twice about it ahead of time. There were also gross out moments that made me lose my appetite. All in all, I liked it.

My new rankings:

1. The Handmaid's Tale (Margaret Atwood)
2. The Bottoms (Joe R. Lansdale)
3. Coraline (Neil Gaiman)
4. Those Who Hunt the Night (Barbara Hambly)
5. The Damnation Game (Clive Barker)
6. The Wolf's Hour (Robert McCammon)
7. Berserk (Tim Lebbon)
8. Best New Horror, Volume 1 (edited by Stephen Jones and Ramsey Campbell)
9. Blood Meridian (Cormac McCarthy)
10. The Imago Sequence (Laird Barron)
11. From the Dust Returned (Ray Bradbury)
12. In Silent Graves (Gary A. Braunbeck)
13. The Tomb (F. Paul Wilson)
14. The Cipher (Kathe Koja)
15. Drawing Blood (Poppy Z. Brite)
16. The Doll Who Ate His Mother (Ramsey Campbell
17. Hotel Transylvania (Chelsea Quinn Yarbro)

The next book I read will be The Year's Best Fantasy #1, edited by Ellen Datlow. 

Have you read Clive Barker? Are you a fan? Did you notice any ongoing themes or opinions of his? Have you read this book? Would you?

May you find your Muse.


16 comments:

  1. Oh my gosh, I don't know how you can do that. My hat's off to you, truly!
    I do write horror, the milder kind where you use your own imagination. Not into the truly graphic, cannot watch it at all. But love Hitchcock
    Great job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love Hitchcock, too! While I usually write less mild horror, the story I just got published was "horror lite."

      Delete
  2. My husband has read two Clive Barker books, and decided they were enough. SyFy and fantasy, yes. Blood and such, no.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, he's really into gore. I'll read the ones on the list, then not sure I'll go past that. He has skill, no doubt about it, but the content just isn't for me.

      Delete
  3. I read this ages ago and really liked it. Barker is very gory.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He definitely is! This one had less gore than I was expecting, which was good. It was well written.

      Delete
  4. I have a hard time reading books where animals are harmed/killed. Kill all the people you want but leave the dogs alone!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was wary the moment dogs were introduced. I kept steeling myself for what was to come. Not a fan of injuring animals, either.

      Delete
  5. I've not read anything of his, but it sounds like you discovered more than you expected. I'm more a fan of suspense, though, rather than an excess of gore.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also prefer suspense over gore. I was pleasantly surprised as compared to what I expected, though, so that was good.

      Delete
  6. Glad this one was a good read. I'm not a big horror fan, but I do dip into King once in a while for a dose of it. I might check this one out for my next trip into that genre.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hm, I really like Lansdale, too. He's less gory.

      Delete
  7. I don't read horror but it's very popular right now - maybe I should give one a try. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is it? That works out well for me! I know that it's had some major lows, but you're right, I see an uptrend in it.

      Delete
  8. I'm not much of a horror fan, so I don't really read the genre.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's definitely a genre with a specific audience, especially with work like Barker's.

      Delete